Home
Sarah, The Bringer of Tea - Of Zombie Commuters, Nice Young Policemen, Creepy Old Men, and Protests
1st October, 2008
12:19 pm

[Link]

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
Of Zombie Commuters, Nice Young Policemen, Creepy Old Men, and Protests

In the days when the Sun was setting on it, British Rail extended the overhead electrification on the Kings Cross to Cambridge line north, beyond Cambridge, to the line's end at Kings Lynn, on the north Norfolk coast. In true British fashion, they did it on the cheap, and the power supply north of Cambridge would supposedly break if you try to take an 8 coach train to Kings Lynn.

This turned out to be fortuitous for me this morning, because of the 6 trains an hour between Cambridge and London, 2 of them are expresses - the xx:15 and xx:45 trains. The xx:45s don't start at Cambridge, but come form the north first, giving the intrepid fenland commuters an hourly fast service to London.

In peak periods though, 4 coaches won't cut it - they struggle to fit the rush hour load in 8, and these are some of the most overcrowded trains in the country. This means that they have 4 waiting at Cambridge and the 4 coming from Norfolk creep up behind them, before coupling onto them. This takes time.

That's why, despite running out onto the platform, breathless at 06:46 this morning, I was still able to catch the infeasibly early 06:45 departure to Kings Cross. It was full of people who sat there for the whole journey in total silence, most of us apparently resenting being there. To add insult to injury, the morning was overcast and we weren't even rewarded with a sunrise for our efforts.

The hurtle at London was otherwise uneventful, and I only had to endure a few stops of nose-to-armpit, oven-like conditions on the Victoria Line before emerging amongst the shop workers, arriving for their morning shifts, at Oxford Circus Underground station.

I made my way to the Royal Society of Medicine on Wimpole Street and found nobody there. For a few minutes I was having visions of being a one-woman protest, and looking very foolish, but others soon arrived, starting with the very pleasant [info]bird_of_paradox, who I'd not met before. Also on the scene were two very young male policemen, there to make sure that the demonstration we had planned went off peacefully, or whatever it is policemen at these things are supposed to do (stand there and look bored for 2 hours, it turns out, but at least they did it decoratively)

After a little while, we were all assembled, and Natacha, who had worked hard to herd everyone on Facebook and cleared everything with the police got to work setting up some placards for some of us to hold. There were three in the event, and we decided there and then what to put on them. "Don't block blockers", "Trans Children are human beings - treat them like it", and "No reparative therapy here".

For those unfamiliar with what's got transpeople so excised over a conference at the Royal Society of Medicine, I'll provide a bit of background. The conference was about the use of GnRH agonist drugs in pubescent trans people to delay their puberty and buy them time. This is a practice that is widespread in some parts of the world, but not in the UK. There's an American-Canadian psychologist called Kenneth Zucker, who was presenting the opening address to the conference, and he has achieved notoriety in the trans community for what many see as the use of aversion/reparative therapy in young children to make them conform to gender roles. Essentially, this involoves punishing the children for playing "inappropriately", until they get "programmed" to react badly to the "inappropriate" gender cues, rather like Alex in A Clockwork Orange, who finds himself feeling violently ill when exposed to Beethoven's 9th Symphony.

Some of us feel this is emotional and psychological abuse. It's bad enough when it's done to adults. Zucker says he's done it with children as young as three. This is where the "ex-gay" movement has run to after being discredited over so-called conversion programmes with homosexual adults and teenagers - it now plys its trade under the guise of "therapy" aimed at preventing children growing up with "gender-inappropriate" behaviour. The subtext is that, "if forcibly stop little Jimmy playing with Barbie, we might stop him from wanting to hug a boy in 15 years time, which he probably won't want to do anyway".

Anyway, we set up what turned out to be a terribly "nice" middle class affair, with us saying, Good morning" to people as they walked past, while offering them a copy of this leaflet. The takeup rate was pretty good, with most people meeting our cheery smiles. A small proportion of people, maybe about 10-20%, walked past us either waving dismissively, or muttering under their breath and looking at us in disgust. There was a surprising correlation between the people who did that, and the people who then went and stood right in front of the arrow in the picture, tugging at a locked door.

Perhaps, in their "not had morning coffee" state, they were thrown by the sight of a bunch of transpeople and allies, distastefully sullying the entrance to the RSM and having the nerve to try and hand out leaflets. They might be contaminated! They might catch TEH TRANZ from them! That's a rather nicer interpretation than the alternative - that a large number of the UK medical establishment's great and good can't work out how to walk through an open door, when there are signs.

But we handed out lots and lots of leaflets. So many, in fact, that by 9am our initial pile of over a hundred leaflets was looking seriously depleted. Thankfully there was a copy shop that was opening for the morning just literally across the road. I nipped in there and had another hundred made, and apparently while I was in there I missed the opportunity to hand a leaflet to Dr Curtis, my erstwhile gender specialist. Oh well.

There was person I didn't miss though, and this has to go down as the creepiest thing that's happened to me today (and something happened earlier this morning that was quite creepy to start with - someone, who I have good reason to believe may work for the Metropolitan Police, has been leaving fun little anonymous comments on my LJ over the Toiletgate incident, so it already faced stiff competition).

There were various people from, mostly non-mainstream media organisations there; I spoke on camera to a lady who was involved in making a film, about why we were protesting. I hope I didn't look like a dork, or sound too male. Anyway, while handing leaflets out, I was dimly aware of someone else hovering around the other side of the street taking photographs of us, the demonstrators, with an SLR camera.

As the time for registration approached, this chap came over and made to go in. One of my fellow demonstrators stopped him and said, "Are you with the press?"

He gave a rather abrupt, "No", and as he was doing so, I said, in the cheery manner we'd been greeting people for the last hour, "Good monring!" and held out a leaflet.

As he took it, I looked up and realised who our would be paparazzo was; I recognised him as none other than Professor Richard Green, formerly head of the Charing Cross Gender Identity Clinic.

And he was hanging around, taking photos of protesters outside an RSM conference on trans issues.

Right. Well that didn't at all feel like the creepy old man hanging round by the school gate, oh no.

Perhaps he has a Little Book of Uppity Trannies. A rogues' gallery of those of us who need putting in our place? I wonder if he realised that I was the same person who playfully taunted him as he left the General Medical Council with his tail between his legs after the GMC had failed to grant him and Charing Cross a virtual monopoly on treatment of transpeople in southern England last year?

If that's the case, you're out of luck, Dick. They already cut it off, dear.

It was nice to see a number of people I knew going in, some of whom stopped for a nice chat and to exchange information (got some fab stuff from the GIRES people). One attendee in particular had a special handout prepared for them - an A4 brown envelope containing 20 copies of the leaflet which they were going to strategically leave around inside.

We never saw Zucker himself, so perhaps he was ferried in a side entrance, lest the bunch of, polite middle class people with the cheery greeting decided to offer him a leaflet and wish him good morning with intent.

But all-in-all, I think the protest went very well. I'm sure plenty of the people we gave the leaflets to were there for other reasons (such as working there), but that's probably good. As with the Bitch protest in May, the effect we were hoping for was to perhaps make the RSM think twice about inviting people like Zucker next time. Perhaps they'll realise that if they rub transpeople's collective noses in it, we'll come along and perhaps cause them a bit of embarrassment in front of their target audience.

In closing, I did feel a bit sorry for the policemen, who got to stand there looking bored (and very, very young - am I really going to be 35 tomorrow?)

I did offer them a copy of the leaflet to read, in order to pass the time, after they realised that nobody had brought pitchforks and flaming torches, but they declined. They seemed like nice chaps anyway.

(Leave a comment)

Comments
 
[User Picture]
From:[info]zoefruitcake
Date:1st October, 2008 01:02 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Perhaps he has a Little Book of Uppity Trannies

maybe you should compile one of your own, like the old 1970s eye spy books for spotting things on long car rides. Then he could just tick you off when spotted and send it in for a badge when completed.
;0)

I agree, very creepy
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 01:12 pm (UTC)
(Link)
"My first Eye-Spy book of the ones who slipped through the net and still have some fight left in them"?

I get the feeling that, what with private specialists, Internet pharmacies, and surgeons who will accept self referrals, the fact that they can't actually stop anyone with enough money from transitioning (thus only getting to lord it over to those who aren't able to tell him where to shove it before going elsewhere) probably really pisses people like Green off.

Diddums.
[User Picture]
From:[info]zoeimogen
Date:1st October, 2008 01:12 pm (UTC)
(Link)
(stand there and look bored for 2 hours, it turns out, but at least they did it decoratively)

Are you turning straight? :-)
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 01:13 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Possibly a bit bi-curious.

Anyway, nuffin wrong with looking at teh pretteh, is there? :-P
[User Picture]
From:[info]woodpijn
Date:1st October, 2008 01:37 pm (UTC)
(Link)
muttering under their breath and looking at us in disgust. There was a surprising correlation between the people who did that, and the people who then went and stood right in front of the arrow in the picture, tugging at a locked door.

:)) Beautifully cutting and witty observation.
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 01:49 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*teehee*

Thank you :-)
[User Picture]
From:[info]bird_of_paradox
Date:1st October, 2008 02:45 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Excellent write-up, thank you.

It was great to meet you, Natacha and everyone else.

Here's hoping our presence contributes to the process in some small way.

Also, is it okay if I link to your piece from my blog?

Helen G
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 02:49 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Thank you!

Also, is it okay if I link to your piece from my blog?

Absolutely!
[User Picture]
From:[info]darwinian_woman
Date:1st October, 2008 02:55 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*grin* - I'm glad to hear the protest went well, and sorry I wasn't around for it.
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 03:20 pm (UTC)
(Link)
It was fun, despite the horrendously early start!
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 03:19 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I didn't go in, so I don't know what was said inside. I shall be making enquiries of my spies though ;-)
[User Picture]
From:[info]cyberspice
Date:1st October, 2008 03:23 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Nice, :-)

I'm miffed that again I couldn't be there but stuck half way around the world. One day I will get to go to one of these things and do my bit. Honest...
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 03:25 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Bet you're gutted about not being in Wiggy's big book o' bolshy trannies, eh? ;-)
[User Picture]
From:[info]nicollegurrl
Date:1st October, 2008 03:31 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I still have to process it in my little poor brain but good
writing anyway :D

[User Picture]
From:[info]lavandergirl
Date:1st October, 2008 03:41 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I recognised him as none other than Professor Richard Green, formerly head of the Charing Cross Gender Identity Clinic.

You mean he isn't there anymore? He is the reason I stopped going!

Back to the topic at hand:
I cant belive anyone would want to do this to children. 'Treatmet' like this would cause enough damage to an adult, let alone a child. "I know what we'll do whenever the kid tries to be himself, we poke it with this cattleprod, cos that wont cause any lasting damage!". All your going to get is a bunch of confused, eternally depressed kids afraid of their own heart.
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 03:47 pm (UTC)
(Link)
You mean he isn't there anymore? He is the reason I stopped going!

He's an ex gender-shrink. His NHS practice has ceased to be. It is no more.

Montgomery has gone too. The only one of the old guard left is Barrett, and I hear he's mellowed a bit these days. Never having been a patient there, I couldn't say for sure, but I think the CX GIC of today is a very different organisation from a few years ago. I've even been known to prop up a bar with their de-facto second in command, Stuart Lorimer.

All your going to get is a bunch of confused, eternally depressed kids afraid of their own heart.

Yeah. Having grown up with the effects of my father's emotional abuse, and knowing how much psychotherapy it's taken to get me through it (and I'm still seeing Dr Demsky, although not for much longer, I suspect), I can only imagine how much damage someone who's been formally trained to poke the mind can do. My heart cries in pain for these kids.
[User Picture]
From:[info]asknosecrets
Date:1st October, 2008 05:07 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*Applauds you* How the hell do you go about this stuff without beating some of these people with their own self importance?
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 09:07 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I smile sweetly, and then stare at the backs of their heads with my laser vision.
[User Picture]
From:[info]hazelstitch
Date:1st October, 2008 05:34 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Wonderful report :)
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 09:08 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Thank you!
[User Picture]
From:[info]lisaquestions
Date:1st October, 2008 05:50 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I saw one of those anonymous comments. Disturbing. :(

[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 06:42 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The one you saw was probably the least pleasant of the two.

I need to talk with some people about this - someone is getting a bit obsessed with us.
[User Picture]
From:[info]ganimede
Date:1st October, 2008 06:38 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I was supposed to be going to that conference actually for my job as a Trans Support Worker, but in the end I couldn't go because the cost was too great. It was £55 just to get into the conference! Mind you, I really didn't want to see either Zucker or Prof Green - he was the organiser so I presume that's why he was hanging around outside taking photos - but Dr Norman Spack was to be there too and I really wanted to hear what he had to say.
[User Picture]
From:[info]the_local_echo
Date:1st October, 2008 10:35 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Richard Green wasn't the organiser of the conference Sarah picketed. He organised a similar one of his own, at the weekend, as a protest because the RSM hadn't invited enough international experts. That was the one Spack was at, I think.

But he invited Zucker to his one too :-(
[User Picture]
From:[info]actionreplay
Date:1st October, 2008 07:13 pm (UTC)
(Link)
As far as the police are concerned, bored is good. It's infinitely better than having a ned wave a knife or sawn off shotgun at you, filling out forms back at the station, or breaking up a fight outside a club. I think they aren't allowed to take leaflets as that might be interpreted as a show of political support.

I'm willing to bet Richard Green was doing that entirely to weird you out.

I'm glad the protest went well. Politeness and smiles gets more people reading your leaflets than the socialist workers braying out slogans any day.
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 09:02 pm (UTC)
(Link)
The thought that Green might just be trying to intimidate us had crossed my mind.

I think I was the only one who knew who he was though, and then I only noticed it was him after he'd finished, so it presumably didn't have much of an effect.
[User Picture]
From:[info]natalie_456
Date:1st October, 2008 08:21 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I'm glad it went well! (I would have joined you but Uni strikes). Lol @ Richard Green. Oh dear.

Thank you Sarah for being so awesome for us transfolk :)
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:1st October, 2008 09:01 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Lol @ Richard Green. Oh dear.

Yeah. What was he thinking? Muppet.

And, aw, shucks. 't warn't nuffin :-D
[User Picture]
From:[info]sebastian_bound
Date:1st October, 2008 11:20 pm (UTC)
(Link)
congrats on what sounds like a successful protest.

i hope someone listens.

Edited at 2008-10-01 23:21 (UTC)
[User Picture]
From:[info]bjh21
Date:2nd October, 2008 08:50 am (UTC)
(Link)
Without wishing to out-train-geek you, the Sectional Appendix actually says that 8-coach EMU formations are cleared north of Milton, but that there's a limit of 5 EMUs total in each section (Milton–Littleport, Littleport–Lynn), which might make timetabling long trains awkward. The platform lengths at Waterbeach, Littleport, and Watlington probably don't help either.

Yes, yes, I appreciate that this is completely tangential to the important part of the post. I'm sorry.
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:2nd October, 2008 09:14 am (UTC)
(Link)
Please, please, please do out train-geek me! I have no desire to acquire a reputation as a train spotter ;-)

I knew they run 8 cars to Ely occasionally, but have to be really careful about it. The line gets seriously mickey mouse north of there, doesn't it?
From:(Anonymous)
Date:2nd October, 2008 05:54 pm (UTC)

Nice write-up

(Link)
Great report about the day.

I haven't had the chance to put much on my blog yet as I am now rushing around like a blue-assed fly but you might find the stuff I have just posted about Ecuador quite interesting.

http://untothineown.blogspot.com

Nice to meet you,

Natacha
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:2nd October, 2008 10:50 pm (UTC)

Re: Nice write-up

(Link)
A pleasure! And yes, a most interesting article about something that looks very promising.

Anyway, I think yesterday went really well, dirty old men like Green aside.
[User Picture]
From:[info]radargrrl
Date:4th October, 2008 02:24 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Congratulations, Sarah! You have really touched a nerve with this one. This is on Lynn Conway and TS Roadmap. Great post!
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:7th October, 2008 12:34 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Thank you - sorry for missing your reply amongst the drama (see below). I'm humbled by all of this, and possibly a bit unnerved :-/
[User Picture]
From:[info]justanormalgirl
Date:6th October, 2008 10:47 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I disagree with Zucker's reparative therapy because I believe it has poor aims. I heard an interview with him in which he was justifying his therapy as leading to likely a homosexual outcome, which he sees as superior to a transsexual outcome. I disagree entirely in the reverse -- though a heterosexal outcome is, of course, preferable, I find a pseudo-heterosexual* transsexual outcome superior to a homosexual one. I suppose the least desirable outcome would be pseudo-homosexual transsexual (such as a gay FTM or lesbian MTF).

Zucker was in charge of one of my friend's cases. Though he proved to be rather conservative in the prescription of HRT, he did eventually sign the prescription himself. She was allowed blockers but estrogen was pending parental approval, which is not really her or Zucker's fault.

It's not that I don't feel that children need to be properly trained in gender behavior, it's the clinical setting I disagree with. We need to value both positive masculine and feminine traits and roles in our society in order to have healthier children, forcing boys to play with trucks and girls to play with dolls isn't going to fix that. It's a systemic issue.

~ Zoe

~~~
* I say "pseudo-heterosexual" and "pseudo-homosexual" not because I don't accept these identities but because the physical realities are different. I myself am a transsexual and have relationships with men who consider themselves "straight". For most social contexts, we are a heterosexual couple but physically we are both male (though my body is changed by female hormones). Perhaps there could be a distinction between "straight" and "heterosexual" such as the difference between "man" as a gender and "male" as a sex.
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:6th October, 2008 11:00 pm (UTC)
(Link)
though a heterosexal outcome is, of course, preferable

Oh, of course. Teh gey is clearly OMG! DISGUSTING!

the least desirable outcome would be pseudo-homosexual transsexual (such as a gay FTM or lesbian MTF).

Being a lesbian MTF is a a fate worse than death, for sure.

I say "pseudo-heterosexual" and "pseudo-homosexual" not because I don't accept these identities but because the physical realities are different. I myself am a transsexual and have relationships with men who consider themselves "straight". For most social contexts, we are a heterosexual couple but physically we are both male (though my body is changed by female hormones).

At this point, I shall defer to Radiohead.

"She looks like the real thing. She tastes like the real thing. My fake plastic love."

And seriously, not finding the homophobia at all cool.
[User Picture]
From:[info]gender_euphoric
Date:7th October, 2008 03:48 am (UTC)
(Link)
well, um...Happy Birthday!
[User Picture]
From:[info]auntysarah
Date:7th October, 2008 12:34 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Thanks!
Powered by LiveJournal.com